schoolsolarpanels Solar for schools and academy trusts Book a roof survey

Specialist solar panels for schools in Newcastle

A kilowatt-peak on a Newcastle school roof models at 806 kWh a year, below the mean across the towns we cover, and the roofs it applies to are mostly carrying nothing. We arrange the roof survey, model the output against the school's own half hourly consumption, and set out the funding routes.

26.5% of the modelled year lands in July and August, on a roof that returns 806 kWh per kWp a year. The worked example below runs at 270 kWp, the size applied for at the nearest school scheme on record. Source: EU PVGIS v5.2, SARAH3, 10 degree pitch, 14 percent system loss.

Book a roof survey in Newcastle
playing field 4 1 2 3 no array pending structural assessment 0 40 m N
  1. 1 teaching block
  2. 2 hall and kitchen
  3. 3 sports hall
  4. 4 1960s block, no array
  5. first phase
  6. later phase
Drawing Illustrative Tyne and Wear estate
Blocks 4, 3 with array
Array about 345 kWp
Yield about 278,000 kWh/yr
Frontage about 90 m / Rev A / Tyne and Wear

Illustrative layout for an estate of this size. The array is drawn at about 345 kWp, roughly 53 percent of the 650 kWp these three roofs would hold, because a school sizes to the load it can use in term time rather than to the roof it has: generation it cannot use is exported at a much lower rate than it pays to import. The hatched block carries no array because its structure has not been assessed, which on a school of that era is the usual starting point rather than an exception. Your own figures, and which of your blocks can take an array, come from the roof survey.

Newcastle / Tyne and Wear
A two storey 1970s school block with a shallow pitched roof covered in solar panels, empty playground in front and a playing field beyond
School buildings of the kind we survey across Tyne and Wear. Not a named school and not our work.

Solar for education buildings across Tyne and Wear

A one kilowatt-peak array on a shallow pitched roof in Newcastle models at 806 kWh a year, from modelled irradiation of 1,026 kWh per square metre in the plane of the array (EU PVGIS v5.2, SARAH3, 10 degree pitch, 14 percent system loss). That is about 9 percent below the mean across the towns we cover, so the case at this latitude rests almost entirely on using the output on site rather than exporting it.

Scaled up, a 270 kWp array, sized to what the nearest school scheme on record applied for, 92 miles away at Morpeth, models at about 217,600 kWh a year before shading, and needs roughly 802 square metres of clear roof. We take the size from the nearest real application rather than a round number, so the example is anchored to something a planning officer has already seen.

Spread across the year that is about 57,700 kWh landing in July and August and roughly 7,600 kWh across December and January. Northern Powergrid sets what may go back onto the network here, so the July figure is the one worth putting in front of a governing body first.

FIG. 1 Newcastle against the rest of Tyne and Wear
  • Sunderland849
  • South Shields849
  • North Shields833
  • Washington828
  • Gateshead822
  • Newcastle806

Newcastle ranks 6 of 6 towns we cover in Tyne and Wear on modelled yield, against a national mean of 886 kWh per kWp. The county runs from 806 to 849, a spread of 43 kWh per kWp. On a 500 kWp array that is about 21,500 kWh a year between the strongest and weakest town in the county.

Bars are zero based, so length is proportional to the figure. Where a county is flat, that is the finding: latitude is not the lever, the timetable is. Source: EU PVGIS v5.2, modelled per town

School solar on record near Newcastle

No school or college solar scheme appears in Newcastle and the area around it in the Renewable Energy Planning Database. That is a reporting threshold rather than a verdict. The database records generating stations from one megawatt upward reliably and smaller ones patchily, and almost every school array is a fraction of that, so a roof full of panels on a Newcastle secondary could be generating today without ever reaching it.

Look 92 miles out and there is one: King Edward Vi School, Cottingwood Lane in Morpeth, 270 kWp, applied for by The Three Rivers Trust, which holds consent and is awaiting construction. None of our doing. It is a public planning record, and the nearest evidence available of how an application like yours is treated around here. Source: Renewable Energy Planning Database, Q1 2026.

Term dates against the Newcastle generation curve

A Newcastle school roof generates most in the weeks its buildings are closed. 26.5 percent of the modelled year lands in July and August alone (EU PVGIS v5.2), and the summer holiday takes roughly six of those nine weeks out of the timetable. May is the strongest single month here at 15.3 percent of the annual total, which is still term time, and that works slightly in your favour against towns whose curve peaks in July.

Winter reverses it. December and January between them return 3.5 percent of the modelled year, and that is when the heating, the lighting and a full register are all drawing at the same time. The roof makes 10.3 times as much in May as it does in December, and August alone outproduces December by about 8 to one. 77 percent of the year arrives between April and September, and the point of that figure is not that the summer half goes unused, because April, May and June are full teaching months that draw hard. It is that the concentration peaks in the few weeks at the end of it when the building is shut.

Nationally this comes out at about 49 percent of annual generation falling on a session day. A business open every weekday sees roughly 71 percent. The 22 point gap is what a school appraisal has to absorb, and it is much the same in Newcastle as anywhere else.

The same mismatch repeats every day. Peak generation lands between eleven and three, the timetable ends shortly after, and by four the site is down to caretaking and cleaning. An annual consumption figure cannot show that, which is why we ask for the half hourly data instead.

The conclusion is not that a Newcastle school should do nothing. It is that the array should be sized to the load that survives the holidays, which is usually the server room, the catering refrigeration, the ventilation and the hot water, plus whatever the site lets out over the summer. Anything above that line needs storage or an export agreement with Northern Powergrid to earn its keep.

We set out the full treatment of the school year against the generation curve on the home page, and what it does to a payback figure under costs.

FIG. 2 A Newcastle roof against the English school year
0 35 70 105 140 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec kWh August: nobody in the building
  • generated while the school is open
  • generated at a weekend or in the holidays
The same figures as a table
Monthly output for a 1 kWp array in Newcastle, split by whether the day is a school session day. Across the year 48 percent of generation lands while the school is open.
Month Session days Output, kWh per kWp School open School closed
Jan 20 16 10 6
Feb 15 31 17 14
Mar 21 63 43 20
Apr 12 99 40 59
May 17 123 67 56
Jun 21 115 81 35
Jul 11 117 42 75
Aug 0 96 0 96
Sep 20 70 47 23
Oct 17 41 22 19
Nov 21 22 15 7
Dec 15 12 6 6
Year 190 805 390 415
Each bar is one month's output per kWp, divided at the school gate. The May bar is 10.3 times the December one and the timetable runs the other way round. We apportion a month's generation evenly over its days, having no half hourly data for your meter. Session days follow a typical English school year of 190 days. Your own trust or authority may differ by a few days either way. Source: EU PVGIS v5.2, session days from a typical school calendar

Grid connection through Northern Powergrid

Northern Powergrid is the network operator here, and their answer on export capacity shapes the design. Any commercial array above 3.68 kW per phase connects under G99 rather than G98, and the application fixes what you are allowed to push back onto the network. If the local network is tight, limiting export rarely breaks the case here: most of the generation is consumed on site while the building is working.

Across Tyne and Wear the planning database records 116 solar schemes totalling 290 MW, of which 3 are operational (REPD Q1 2026).

Book the survey

Book a roof survey at your Newcastle school

Roof condition decides the order of works on most school estates, so that is where we start. Send us the postcode and a rough roof area, with twelve months of half hourly readings if you have them, and we come back with usable area, modelled output against your own load, and the funding routes.

Lenzie Consulting Ltd arranges the survey and passes your details to an MCS-certified installation partner so they can quote. We do not carry out the installation ourselves.

We pass your details to our MCS-certified installation partner so they can quote. Read the privacy notice.

Newcastle school solar, answered

How much would a school roof near Newcastle generate?
Modelled at 806 kWh per kWp a year, a 270 kWp array on a Newcastle school models at about 217,600 kWh. What decides whether that is worth doing is how much of it the school uses itself, not the total. Source: EU PVGIS v5.2, SARAH3, 10 degree pitch, 14 percent system loss.
How does the school year affect a solar scheme in Newcastle?
It goes somewhere, just not into the timetable. 26.5 percent of the Newcastle generating year lands in July and August (EU PVGIS v5.2), and a closed school still runs servers, comms, refrigeration and ventilation. What that base load does not absorb is either stored, exported under an agreement with Northern Powergrid, or a sign the array is too big. We test which before sizing anything.
Which network operator handles the connection at a Newcastle school?
Applications go to Northern Powergrid, who run the network across Tyne and Wear. An export-limited offer usually still works for a school, because the summer surplus is the part you were least likely to be paid much for anyway.

Nearby

All Tyne and Wear locations