schoolsolarpanels Solar for schools and academy trusts Book a roof survey

Specialist solar panels for schools in Newtown

What decides a solar scheme at a Newtown school is how much of the output the site uses itself, not how much the roof makes. What we come back with is the usable roof area, the modelled output against your meter data, and the routes schools use to pay for it.

25.9% of the modelled year lands in July and August, on a roof that returns 820 kWh per kWp a year. The worked example below runs at 150 kWp, the size applied for at the nearest school scheme on record. Source: EU PVGIS v5.2, SARAH3, 10 degree pitch, 14 percent system loss.

Book a roof survey in Newtown
playing field 4 1 2 3 no array pending structural assessment 0 40 m N
  1. 1 teaching block
  2. 2 hall and kitchen
  3. 3 sports hall
  4. 4 1960s block, no array
  5. first phase
  6. later phase
Drawing Illustrative Powys estate
Blocks 4, 3 with array
Array about 345 kWp
Yield about 283,000 kWh/yr
Frontage about 90 m / Rev A / SY16

Illustrative layout for an estate of this size. The array is drawn at about 345 kWp, roughly 53 percent of the 650 kWp these three roofs would hold, because a school sizes to the load it can use in term time rather than to the roof it has: generation it cannot use is exported at a much lower rate than it pays to import. The hatched block carries no array because its structure has not been assessed, which on a school of that era is the usual starting point rather than an exception. Your own figures, and which of your blocks can take an array, come from the roof survey.

Newtown / Powys
A school in a South Wales valley town, solar arrays on its roofs and steep green hillsides rising behind
School buildings of the kind we survey across Wales. Not a named school and not our work.

School rooftop solar across Powys

A one kilowatt-peak array on a shallow pitched roof in Newtown models at 820 kWh a year, from modelled irradiation of 1,045 kWh per square metre in the plane of the array (EU PVGIS v5.2, SARAH3, 10 degree pitch, 14 percent system loss). That is about 7 percent below the mean across the towns we cover, so the case at this latitude rests almost entirely on using the output on site rather than exporting it.

Scaled up, a 150 kWp array, sized to what the nearest school scheme on record applied for, 55 miles away at Stafford, models at about 123,000 kWh a year before shading, and needs roughly 446 square metres of clear roof. We take the size from the nearest real application rather than a round number, so the example is anchored to something a planning officer has already seen.

Spread across the year that is about 31,900 kWh landing in July and August and roughly 4,900 kWh across December and January. National Grid Electricity Distribution sets what may go back onto the network here, so the July figure is the one worth putting in front of a governing body first.

FIG. 1 Newtown against the rest of Powys
  • Hay on Wye838
  • Welshpool831
  • Builth Wells830
  • Brecon828
  • Llandrindod Wells825
  • Newtown820

Newtown ranks 6 of 6 towns we cover in Powys on modelled yield, against a national mean of 886 kWh per kWp. The county runs from 820 to 838, a spread of 18 kWh per kWp. Within Powys that difference is small enough to ignore: where the building sits is not what decides this scheme, your consumption pattern is.

Bars are zero based, so length is proportional to the figure. Where a county is flat, that is the finding: latitude is not the lever, the timetable is. Source: EU PVGIS v5.2, modelled per town

What the planning record shows around Newtown

The SY16 postcode district has no education solar entry in the Renewable Energy Planning Database. Almost no school array is large enough to be captured there reliably, so the absence tells you about the reporting threshold and very little about what is already on the roofs around Newtown.

The nearest education scheme on the record is 55 miles from Newtown, at Stafford: 150 kWp at Stafford Manor High School, Rising Brook, applicant eEnergy Group PLC, which holds consent and is awaiting construction. That is someone else's application, not ours, and it is here because it shows what Staffordshire planning has already accepted at an education site. Source: Renewable Energy Planning Database, Q1 2026.

The summer holiday problem for a Newtown school

25.9 percent of the annual output modelled for Newtown arrives in the two months a school uses least (EU PVGIS v5.2). Term ends in the third week of July and the buildings stay largely empty until September. June is the strongest single month here at 14.1 percent of the annual total, which is still term time, and that works slightly in your favour against towns whose curve peaks in July.

The inverse holds at the other end. December and January together return only 4 percent of the year, and those are the months with the heating, the lighting and the full timetable all running at once. The roof makes 7.7 times as much in June as it does in December, and August alone outproduces December by about 6.5 to one. 75 percent of the year arrives between April and September, and the point of that figure is not that the summer half goes unused, because April, May and June are full teaching months that draw hard. It is that the concentration peaks in the few weeks at the end of it when the building is shut.

Summed over the year, about 49 percent of what a school roof makes arrives while the school is open. For a business trading every weekday the equivalent is roughly 71 percent. Nothing about Newtown changes that ratio much, but plenty about your own site changes what to do with it.

Daily shape compounds it. A school's load climbs from breakfast club, holds through the teaching day and falls away from about three in the afternoon, while generation is still strong until six in high summer. That is why we size against half hourly meter data rather than against annual consumption: the annual figure hides both problems.

A Newtown governing body should read that as a sizing constraint, not a reason to stop. The base load that runs through the holidays, servers, comms, refrigeration, ventilation and hot water, is the floor the array should be built up from, and everything above it has to be justified by storage, export or summer occupancy.

We set out the full treatment of the school year against the generation curve on the home page, and what it does to a payback figure under costs.

FIG. 2 A Newtown roof against the Welsh school year
0 30 60 90 120 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec kWh August: nobody in the building
  • generated while the school is open
  • generated at a weekend or in the holidays
The same figures as a table
Monthly output for a 1 kWp array in Newtown, split by whether the day is a school session day. Across the year 49 percent of generation lands while the school is open.
Month Session days Output, kWh per kWp School open School closed
Jan 20 18 12 6
Feb 15 33 18 15
Mar 21 67 45 22
Apr 12 99 40 59
May 17 115 63 52
Jun 21 116 81 35
Jul 11 115 41 74
Aug 0 97 0 97
Sep 20 75 50 25
Oct 17 45 25 20
Nov 21 25 18 8
Dec 15 15 7 8
Year 190 820 400 420
Each bar is one month's output per kWp, divided at the school gate. The June bar is 7.7 times the December one and the timetable runs the other way round. We apportion a month's generation evenly over its days, having no half hourly data for your meter. Session days follow a typical school year in England and Wales, 190 days on broadly the same dates. Your own authority or trust may differ by a few days. Source: EU PVGIS v5.2, session days from a typical school calendar

Grid connection through National Grid Electricity Distribution

Connections around Newtown are handled by National Grid Electricity Distribution, which sets the export limit for the site. Above 3.68 kW per phase the connection runs under G99, so the export limit is agreed in advance rather than assumed. Where the local network is constrained, an export-limited connection usually still makes the scheme work, because a school uses most of what the roof makes during the working day.

Across Powys the planning database records 18 solar schemes totalling 39 MW, of which 1 are operational (REPD Q1 2026).

Book the survey

Start with the Newtown roof

The first survey answers three questions at once: what the roofs carry, what they generate against your own timetable, and how a Newtown school pays for it. Send the postcode, an approximate roof area per block and half hourly meter data if the school can get it from its supplier.

Lenzie Consulting Ltd arranges the survey and passes your details to an MCS-certified installation partner so they can quote. We do not carry out the installation ourselves.

We pass your details to our MCS-certified installation partner so they can quote. Read the privacy notice.

Questions governors ask us about Newtown schools

What would a 150 kWp array produce at a Newtown school?
Yes, and the figure matters more than the sunshine. 820 kWh per kWp a year puts a 150 kWp array at around 123,000 kWh, on roughly 446 square metres of roof. The value of that depends on your term time load. Source: EU PVGIS v5.2, SARAH3, 10 degree pitch, 14 percent system loss.
What happens to the electricity during the summer holidays in Newtown?
Less is wasted than governors expect, but the figure is worth seeing: 25.9 percent of the year is modelled to arrive in July and August here (EU PVGIS v5.2), against a site running on holiday base load. Lettings, holiday clubs and summer works take some of it, storage takes more, and the rest is an export question for National Grid Electricity Distribution.
Who do we apply to for export near Newtown?
Only National Grid Electricity Distribution can answer it for your connection. What we can say is that a capped export limit rarely breaks a school scheme, because the array that suits a school is sized to the term time load rather than to the roof.
Do we need planning permission in Powys?
Often not, because panels on the roof of a school building usually sit within permitted development for non-domestic buildings. The exceptions are listed buildings, conservation areas and arrays that project too far above the roof plane, and larger schemes still need prior approval from Powys. We confirm it either way.